A follow-up.

SAN FRANCISCO (Los Angeles Times) May 9 – A Quaker who lost her appointment as a Cal State Fullerton lecturer after she objected to a state loyalty oath submitted a revised statement of her beliefs Thursday in a bid to win the job back.

People For the American Way, a Washington-based civil rights group now representing lecturer Wendy Gonaver, called on the university to reinstate her and adopt a policy protecting the religious freedom of all California State University system employees.

“She is willing to sign the oath as long as she can exercise her free-speech rights and note that her views as a Quaker would prevent her from taking up arms,” said Kathryn Kolbert, president of the organization and a constitutional lawyer. “We would like to avoid filing a lawsuit, but we are certainly prepared to do so if we need to.”

The loyalty oath was added to the California Constitution in 1952 to drive communists out of public jobs but in recent years it has forced out religious believers such as Quakers and Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Gonaver was hired to teach classes in American and women’s studies at Fullerton this academic year. But in August, just before classes were to start, she was told of the state requirement that she sign the oath promising to defend the U.S. and California constitutions “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

A pacifist, she feared that signing the oath could commit her to bear arms. She said she would sign the pledge if she could submit a statement of her beliefs, a practice allowed at the University of California. But Cal State officials rejected her request, saying the addendum she proposed was illegal.

After the Los Angeles Times reported on Gonaver’s case a week ago, People For the American Way offered to represent her. Kolbert said the U.S. has a long history of religious freedom and that the university should protect civil liberties.

“This nation was founded by people who came here to escape religious persecution,” she said. “These are traditional American values that have been around as long as our country has been here.”

Christine Helwick, general counsel for the 23-campus Cal State system, said in an e-mail Thursday that the university now was willing to work with Gonaver and her attorneys.

The campus is now going to engage her in an interactive process to see if her issues with the Constitutionally mandated oath can be resolved,” Helwick said.

In an attempt to reach a compromise, the civil liberties group helped Gonaver refine her statement of beliefs and submitted the revised wording to the university.

Gonaver said in an interview that she was pleased to be represented by the group and that the new statement expressed her views more elegantly and succinctly than the earlier version without altering the meaning.

“In signing the required loyalty oath I must also attest to my belief that such an oath violates my right to free speech, and could be construed to express undertakings that are contrary to my nonviolent religious beliefs as a Quaker,” Gonaver said in the new statement.

Helwick said the campus might not be able to rehire her despite the revision: “The addendum she is now proposing is different in tone, scope and content from the one she originally presented. However, the position for which she originally applied last August had to be filled by someone else when she refused to sign the oath.”

Gonaver is not the only instructor who lost a job over the oath. In February, Cal State East Bay fired a Quaker math instructor who signed the oath but inserted the word “nonviolently.” She was rehired after Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown’s office drafted a statement saying the oath would not commit her to bear arms.

People For the American Way urged the university to adopt a new policy saying: “CSU recognizes that some of our employees may have religious or other objections to taking this oath. It is our policy to accommodate the religious and other beliefs of our employees by allowing an employee to append an explanatory statement to the employee’s signed oath.”

Kolbert said the organization would call on its members in California, who number in the hundreds of thousands, to protest the university’s treatment of Gonaver.

“We think this is an easy one to resolve,” she said.

Copyright 2008, Los Angeles Times

7 Responses

  1. I’ve linked to this at http://freecommonwealth.blogspot.com/2008/05/no-false-patriotic-wreath.html relating it to certain current debates about oaths and Britishness.

  2. it seems to me everyone has gone off the deep end. I read yesterday in your state some teens were sent home from school because they didn’t stand while reciting the pledge of alligency to the flag. also some fool made students eat on gym floor. as for the pledge they said the children were to do as told by teacher, true but were they ordered to stand or was it just excepted that they would? besides the children liked being sent home! the students who had to eat in the gym were spanish and the teach was black . no importance according to the school. right!

  3. patsy: That case was investigated, and while the administrator involved was cleared of discrimination charges, she is going to be disciplined and may yet lose her job. She’s been in trouble before, aparently.

    Yup, making kids eat their lunch on the gym floor is a bad move. Dumb. For any reason.

    Kids, like adults, have some rights in school. Folks sometimes seem to “forget” that.

  4. When Cal State fired me, they said I could submit a statement expressing my point of view.(I wanted to know why they said nonviolence was incompatible with the oath, but they would not tell me…) Wendy wanted to submit a satement expressing her point of view, but they told her it was not allowed. In the first LA Times article they said it was “clearly illegal”. Huh?
    People for the Americn Way have an online petiton-Sign it!!!! http://www.kintera.org/site/apps/ka/ct/contactcustom.asp?c=feIJKQMEF&b=4119631

  5. Go to the following webpage to read about the 1994 Jehovah’s Witness lawsuit in which Fresno City College was court-ordered to pay a mother-daughter pair of JWs $260,000.00 over this issue, and other similars:

    http://jwemployees.bravehost.com/NewsReports/2003.html

  6. I know that JW’s a few other believers have been objecting to saying the Pledge for many years. There were a couple in some of my elementary school classes, in CA in the late 60’s. They stood with us, but did not say anything.

    Can students be (legally, morally, ) made to stand up, however?

    I would have thought this would have been settled law by now, and was surprised at the number of cases (and dollar amounts) that various governmental entities have had to pay out, for so many years.

Leave a Reply